AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Robonaut
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Robonaut (NASA) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
Robonaut—
Year First Available
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Robonaut2011
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- Robonaut0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- RobonautACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- Robonaut—
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- Robonaut—
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Robonautindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Robonaut9.1 kg
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Robonaut14
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Robonaut7
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- RobonautCameras in the head; processor in the torso
Programming
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Robonautcode_ros
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Robonautcode_ros
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- Robonautteleoperation, research
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | RobonauthumanoidNASA 37.2Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 9.1 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 14 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Cameras in the head; processor in the torso |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_ros |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_ros |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | teleoperation, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Height, Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Robonaut compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.