AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs 天链人形机器人T1
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and 天链人形机器人T1 (四川天链机器人股份有限公司) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
天链人形机器人T1CN
Year First Available
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T12024
Verified Deployments
AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
天链人形机器人T10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
天链人形机器人T1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T1160 mm
Weight
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T143 kg
Mobility Type
AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
天链人形机器人T1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
天链人形机器人T1full bipedal
Walking Speed
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T12.2 m/s
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T18 kg
Payload (Peak)
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T116 kg
Total DOF
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T171
Hand DOF
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T13
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
天链人形机器人T1prototype
Commercial
Applications
AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
天链人形机器人T1research, hazardous_env
AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.16.0Trust Score | 天链人形机器人T1humanoid四川天链机器人股份有限公司46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 43 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2.2 m/s |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 8 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 16 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 71 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Terrain, Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Onboard Compute, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs 天链人形机器人T1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.