AGIBOT X1 vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT X1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 AGIBOT X1humanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.43.9Trust Score |  NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 33.8 kg | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 52 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 22 |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 30 N | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Xyber-Edge cerebellum controller, Xyber-DCU domain controller | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson or x86 PC | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | voice, mobile app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Isaac Gym, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | healthcare_assistance, education, service_industry | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT X1 vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.