AGIBOT X1 vs NEO Home Robot
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT X1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and NEO Home Robot (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
Battery / Shift Runtime
Availability Status
Physical Form Factor
Weight
Height
Mobility Type
Humanoid Subtype
Walking Speed
Terrain
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
Total DOF
Arm DOF
Hand DOF
Grip Strength
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
Compute Platform
Teleoperation
Programming
Battery & Power
Runtime
Charging Method
Battery Swap
Software
SDK Languages
ROS Support
Simulation Platforms
Open API
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
Commercial
Price (USD)
Price Tier
Pricing Model
Warranty
Applications
 AGIBOT X1humanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.43.9Trust Score |  NEO Home Robothumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available | 2025 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 33.8 kg | 29.9 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | companion |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 8.2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 22 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 22 |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 30 N | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Xyber-Edge cerebellum controller, Xyber-DCU domain controller | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson or x86 PC | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | voice, mobile app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Isaac Gym, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | healthcare_assistance, education, service_industry | eldercare_assistance, household_management, personal_assistant |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT X1 vs NEO Home Robot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.