Side-by-side comparison of AI Sweet Mate (Noetix Robotics) and Nao (SoftBank Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Height

Weight

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Bimanual Coordination

Onboard Compute

VLM Capable

Foundation Models

Imitation Learning

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Charging Method

Battery Swap

Fall Recovery

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Open API

Deployment Maturity

Price (USD)

Price Tier

RaaS / Month

Pricing Model

Warranty

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $2,785 | $32,990 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 98 mm | 5800 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 17 kg | 0.5 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 0.1 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 0.5 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 21 | 25 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 6 TOPS | ATOM E3845 1.91 GHz, Quad core |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | mobile_app | — |
| Programming (values differ) | visual_block, proprietary_app | visual_block, code_python |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | visual_block, proprietary_app | Python, C++, JavaScript |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | No |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | production pilot | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,785 | $32,990 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 20-40K |
| RaaS / Month (values differ) | — | $647 |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | capex, raas |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | education, research | education, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
AI Sweet Mate is made by Noetix Robotics, based in CN. Nao is made by SoftBank Robotics, based in US.
AI Sweet Mate launched in 2025. Nao launched in 2008.
AI Sweet Mate is listed at $2,785. Nao is listed at $32,990.
AI Sweet Mate scores 30/100. Nao scores 48/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
AI Sweet Mate vs Nao compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.