AMB-150 vs TORU
Side-by-side comparison of AMB-150 (Shanghai Seer Intelligent Technology Corporation) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AMB-150China
- TORUGermany
Year First Available
- AMB-150—
- TORU2016
Verified Deployments
- AMB-1500 Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AMB-150Contact for quote
- TORU$63,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AMB-15012 hrs
- TORU9 hrs
Availability Status
- AMB-150ACTIVE
- TORUACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- AMB-150—
- TORU95 kg
AMR Subtype
- AMB-150—
- TORUother
Length
- AMB-150800 mm
- TORU102.4 mm
Width
- AMB-150560 mm
- TORU66.9 mm
Turning Radius
- AMB-150840 mm
- TORU—
Min Aisle Width
- AMB-150700 mm
- TORU—
Ground Clearance
- AMB-15025 mm
- TORU—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- AMB-150lidar slam,qr code,reflector
- TORUother
Localization Accuracy
- AMB-1505 mm
- TORU—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- AMB-150lifepo4
- TORUother
Battery Capacity
- AMB-1501.2 kWh
- TORU—
Battery Swap
- AMB-150Yes
- TORU—
Safety
Emergency Stops
- AMB-1501
- TORU—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AMB-150Contact for quote
- TORU$63,000 USD
Warranty
- AMB-150—
- TORU1 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $63,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 12 hrs | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 95 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | — | other |
| Length (values differ) | 800 mm | 102.4 mm |
| Width (values differ) | 560 mm | 66.9 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 840 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 700 mm | — |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | 25 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,qr code,reflector | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 5 mm | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | lifepo4 | other |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.2 kWh | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 1 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $63,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Robot Weight, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AMB-150 | TORU |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $63,000 |
| Payback period | — | 15.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $187,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +297% |
AMB-150 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AMB-150 and TORU?
AMB-150 is made by Shanghai Seer Intelligent Technology Corporation, based in CN. TORU is made by Magazino, based in DE.
How do AMB-150 and TORU compare on the Robo Score?
AMB-150 scores 38.8 on the Robo Score. TORU scores 73.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AMB-150 and TORU in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AMB-150 and TORU?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AMB-150 vs TORU compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.