AMBER 2 vs Potaro
Side-by-side comparison of AMBER 2 (Maxon) and Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
.jpg)
AMBER 2CH
PotaroJP
Year First Available
- AMBER 22018
- Potaro2023
Verified Deployments
- AMBER 20 Deployments
- Potaro0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- AMBER 2$289
- PotaroContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AMBER 220 hrs
- Potaro—
Availability Status
- AMBER 2ACTIVE
- PotaroACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AMBER 2187.3 mm
- Potaro1984 mm
Weight
- AMBER 20.4 kg
- Potaro—
Mobility Type
- AMBER 2—
- Potarowheeled
Humanoid Subtype
- AMBER 2—
- Potaroservice humanoid
Terrain
- AMBER 2—
- Potaroflat_indoor
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AMBER 2Apple H2 headphone chip
- PotaroGeneral server with two GPUs
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AMBER 220 hrs
- Potaro—
Avg Power Consumption
- AMBER 2—
- Potaro1,500 W
Safety
Human Detection Method
- AMBER 2—
- Potarovision human
Reliability
IP Rating
- AMBER 2IP65
- Potaro—
Deployment Maturity
- AMBER 2—
- Potaroproduction pilot
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AMBER 2$289
- PotaroContact for quote
Price Tier
- AMBER 210-20K
- Potaro—
Pricing Model
- AMBER 2purchase
- Potaro—
Warranty
- AMBER 21 yrs
- Potaro—
Production Pilots
- AMBER 2—
- PotaroToyota Memorial Hospital
Applications
- AMBER 2—
- Potarohospitality
| AMBER 2humanoidMaxon 46.5Trust Score | PotarohumanoidToyota Motor Corporation 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CH | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2018 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $289 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 20 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 187.3 mm | 1984 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 0.4 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | service humanoid |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Apple H2 headphone chip | General server with two GPUs |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 20 hrs | — |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | — | 1,500 W |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | IP65 | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $289 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | Toyota Memorial Hospital |
| Applications (values differ) | — | hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Total DOF, Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time
About this comparison
AMBER 2 vs Potaro compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.