ANYmal vs IRB 2600
Side-by-side comparison of ANYmal (ANYbotics AG) and IRB 2600 (ABB) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 ANYmalindustrial-armANYbotics AG53.4Trust Score |  IRB 2600industrial-armABB59.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | Switzerland | Switzerland |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | 1,650 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | ±0.03 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 10 kg | 12 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Manufacturing buyers) | IP67 | IP67 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Path Accuracy (values differ) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 235 kg |
| IP Rating (Wrist) (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Performance | ||
| Cycle Time (25/305/25) (values differ) | — | 0.4 s |
| MTBF (values differ) | — | 100,000 hrs |
| Duty Cycle | continuous 24 7 | continuous 24 7 |
| Vibration Damping (values differ) | — | active model based |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.3 PLd |
| Dual Check Safety (values differ) | — | Yes |
| E-Stop Response (values differ) | — | 15 ms |
| Safe Zone Count (values differ) | — | 8 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | ANYdrive, three Intel i7 processors | R-30iB Plus |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | — | KAREL, TP |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | ruggedized tablet | smart pad |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | RobotStudio |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | vendor supported |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | FANUC ZDT |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | ml based |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm and wrist |
| Pneumatic Lines (values differ) | — | 2 |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | — | 12 |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Service Network (values differ) | — | global |
| Spare Parts Lead Time (values differ) | — | 14 days |
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | — | 10 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Max TCP Speed, Safety I/O Pairs, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, Cybersecurity Certs, Tool Changer (ISO), Price (USD)
About this comparison
ANYmal vs IRB 2600 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.