Aura vs Core
Side-by-side comparison of Aura (Comau) and Core (Standard Bots) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AuraItaly
- CoreUnited States
Year First Available
- Aura2016
- Core—
Verified Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments
- Core0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Aura$80,000 USD
- Core$37,000–$42,000 USD
Availability Status
- AuraACTIVE
- CoreACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- Aura2,800 mm
- Core1,300 mm
Repeatability
- Aura—
- Core±0.025 mm
Payload
- Aura170 kg
- Core18 kg
Degrees of Freedom
- Aura6
- Core6
Max TCP Speed
- Aura—
- Core3 m/s
Robot Weight
- Aura—
- Core32 kg
Mounting Options
- Auraupside down
- Corefloor, mobile
Safety
Safety Rating
- AuraISO/TS 15066
- Corenot stated
Force/Torque Sensing
- AuraYes
- Corenone
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- Aura—
- CoreYes
Offline Programming
- Aura—
- CoreNo
Programming Interface
- Aurano_code_gui
- Coreno-code visual programming
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- Aura—
- CoreNo
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Aura$80,000 USD
- Core$37,000–$42,000 USD
Lead Time
- Aura—
- Core4 wks
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $37,000–$42,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 2,800 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | ±0.025 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 170 kg | 18 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 3 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 32 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | upside down | floor, mobile |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | not stated |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | no-code visual programming |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | — | No |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $37,000–$42,000 USD |
| Lead Time (values differ) | — | 4 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Aura | Core |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $80,000 | $39,500 |
| Payback period | 19.2 mo | 9.5 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $170,000 | $210,500 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +213% | +533% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Aura and Core?
Aura is made by Comau, based in IT. Core is made by Standard Bots, based in US.
How do Aura and Core compare on the Robo Index?
Aura grades AAA on the Robo Index. Core grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Aura compare to Core?
Aura has a reach of 2800 mm. Core has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are Aura and Core in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Aura and Core?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Aura vs Core compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.