Side-by-side comparison of BellaBot (Pudu) and MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
BellaBotCNVerified Deployments
BellaBot0 DeploymentsBattery / Shift Runtime
BellaBot24 hrsAvailability Status
BellaBotACTIVEHeight
BellaBot1290 mmMobility Type
BellaBot—Humanoid Subtype
BellaBot—Walking Speed
BellaBot1.2 m/sTerrain
BellaBotindoorPayload
BellaBot40 kgPayload (Peak)
BellaBot—Total DOF
BellaBot—Arm DOF
BellaBot—Arm Reach
BellaBot—Onboard Compute
BellaBot—Compute Platform
BellaBot—VLM Capable
BellaBot—Imitation Learning
BellaBot—Teleoperation
BellaBot—Programming
BellaBot—Runtime
BellaBot24 hrsCharging Method
BellaBot—Battery Swap
BellaBot—Fall Recovery
BellaBot—Human Detection Method
BellaBot—SDK Languages
BellaBot—Open API
BellaBot—Deployment Maturity
BellaBot—Applications
BellaBothospitality BellaBothumanoidPudu42.9Trust Score | MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 24 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1290 mm | 136.9 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 40 kg | 2 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 5 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 50 cm |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 24 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Open API (values differ) | — | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | beta pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Weight, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
BellaBot vs MagicBot Z1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.