Charlie vs Eva
Side-by-side comparison of Charlie (DFKI Robotics Innovation Center) and Eva (Hanson Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 CharliehumanoidDFKI Robotics Innovation Center10.0Trust Score |  EvahumanoidHanson Robotics10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Hong Kong |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2012 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $23,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 24 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 25 cm | 167 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 18 kg | 9.5 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | research platform | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 120 kg | 0.6 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 6 | 83 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 6 | 15 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 8 | 10 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | independent |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Mini ITX computer with DFKI ZynqBrain | NVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel i7 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | cloud only |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | joystick, teleoperation | visual_block, code_python |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 24 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | joystick, teleoperation | visual_block, code_python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | IP20 |
| Deployment Maturity | production pilot | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $23,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | lease | pre-order |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | space robotics | machine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Charlie vs Eva compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.