类人型机器人 vs Potaro
Side-by-side comparison of 类人型机器人 (上海傅利叶智能科技有限公司) and Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
27.9Trust Score |  PotarohumanoidToyota Motor Corporation27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $416,528 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1650 mm | 1984 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 55 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | 44 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | General server with two GPUs |
| Programming (values differ) | no_code_gui, code_ros | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | — | 1,500 W |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | no_code_gui, code_ros | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $416,528 | Contact for quote |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | Toyota Memorial Hospital |
| Applications (values differ) | service, education | hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
类人型机器人 vs Potaro compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.