Side-by-side comparison of Core (Standard Bots) and CR-35iA (FANUC) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Availability Status

Payload

Max TCP Speed

Reach

Degrees of Freedom

Repeatability

Robot Weight

Mounting Options

Safety Rating

Force/Torque Sensing

No-Code Capable

Offline Programming

Programming Interface

ROS Compatible

Price (USD)

Lead Time

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $37,000–$42,000 USD | $78,750 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 18 kg | 35 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 3 m/s | 0.5 m/s |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,300 mm | 1,813 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.025 mm | ±0.04 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 32 kg | 990 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, mobile | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | not stated | ISO 9283 |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no-code visual programming | teach_pendant |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $37,000–$42,000 USD | $78,750 USD |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 4 wks | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty
Frequently asked
Core is made by Standard Bots, based in US. CR-35iA is made by FANUC, based in JP.
Core scores 69/100. CR-35iA scores 74/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Core has a reach of 1300 mm. CR-35iA has a reach of 1813 mm.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Core vs CR-35iA compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.