DARwIn OP vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of DARwIn OP (RoMeLa) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
DARwIn OPKR
NEOUS
Year First Available
- DARwIn OP—
- NEO2026
Verified Deployments
- DARwIn OP0 Deployments
- NEO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- DARwIn OP$499
- NEO$20,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- DARwIn OP0.5 hrs
- NEO4 hrs
Availability Status
- DARwIn OPACTIVE
- NEOACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- DARwIn OP455 mm
- NEO1676.4 mm
Weight
- DARwIn OP9.1 kg
- NEO29.9 kg
Mobility Type
- DARwIn OP—
- NEObipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- DARwIn OPbipedal
- NEOservice humanoid
Walking Speed
- DARwIn OP0.2 m/s
- NEO1.4 m/s
Terrain
- DARwIn OPindoor
- NEOflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- DARwIn OP—
- NEO25 kg
Total DOF
- DARwIn OP20
- NEO52
Arm DOF
- DARwIn OP3
- NEO7
Hand DOF
- DARwIn OP—
- NEO22
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- DARwIn OPIntel Atom N2600 @1.6 GHz dual core
- NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
Foundation Models
- DARwIn OP—
- NEO1X World Model
Programming
- DARwIn OPC++, Python, LabVIEW, MATLAB
- NEOvoice, mobile app
Battery & Power
Runtime
- DARwIn OP0.5 hrs
- NEO4 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- DARwIn OPC++, Python, LabVIEW, MATLAB
- NEOvoice, mobile app
ROS Support
- DARwIn OPYes
- NEO—
Open API
- DARwIn OPYes
- NEO—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- DARwIn OP—
- NEOprototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- DARwIn OP$499
- NEO$20,000
Price Tier
- DARwIn OP10-20K
- NEO<10K
Pricing Model
- DARwIn OP—
- NEOpurchase
Warranty
- DARwIn OP1 yrs
- NEO3 yrs
Applications
- DARwIn OPeducation, research, outreach
- NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
| DARwIn OPhumanoidRoMeLa 37.2Trust Score | NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | KR | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $499 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 455 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 9.1 kg | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.2 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 20 | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 3 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Intel Atom N2600 @1.6 GHz dual core | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | C++, Python, LabVIEW, MATLAB | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | C++, Python, LabVIEW, MATLAB | voice, mobile app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $499 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | education, research, outreach | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
DARwIn OP vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.