Double 3 vs QB-ROBOT-72
Side-by-side comparison of Double 3 (Double Robotics) and QB-ROBOT-72 (Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Double 3—
- QB-ROBOT-72China
Verified Deployments
- Double 30 Deployments
- QB-ROBOT-720 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Double 3Contact for quote
- QB-ROBOT-72$3,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Double 3—
- QB-ROBOT-726 hrs
Availability Status
- Double 3ACTIVE
- QB-ROBOT-72ACTIVE
Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- Double 3hybrid
- QB-ROBOT-72lidar slam
Power
Battery Runtime
- Double 3—
- QB-ROBOT-726 hrs
Auto Docking
- Double 3Yes
- QB-ROBOT-72—
Display & UX
Voice Interaction
- Double 3No
- QB-ROBOT-72—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Double 3Contact for quote
- QB-ROBOT-72$3,000
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $3,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | hybrid | lidar slam |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Display & UX | ||
| Voice Interaction (values differ) | No | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $3,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Payload, Robot Weight, Tray Count, Compartment Type, Dimensions, IP Rating, Max Speed, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Floor Compatibility, Display Size, Noise Level, Languages Supported, RaaS / Month, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Double 3 and QB-ROBOT-72?
Double 3 is made by Double Robotics. QB-ROBOT-72 is made by Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do Double 3 and QB-ROBOT-72 compare on the Robolist Product Score?
Double 3 scores 0/100. QB-ROBOT-72 scores 35/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Double 3 and QB-ROBOT-72 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Hospitality Service robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Double 3 and QB-ROBOT-72?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
Double 3 vs QB-ROBOT-72 compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.