ECCE vs Mercury
Side-by-side comparison of ECCE (The Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project) and Mercury (UT Austin, Meka Robotics, Apptronik) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 ECCEhumanoidThe Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project—Trust Score |  MercuryhumanoidUT Austin, Meka Robotics, Apptronik—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$250,000 | US$150,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1050 mm | 1180 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 26 kg | 55 kg |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 60 | 19 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | PC connected to a distributed microcontroller network by CAN bus or i2c | Jetson Orin Nano SUPER 8GB |
| Programming (values differ) | teleoperation | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | teleoperation | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $250,000 | $150,000 |
| Price Tier | 150K+ | 150K+ |
| Applications (values differ) | — | warehouse_transport, assembly, inspection |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
ECCE vs Mercury compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.