EMMA L vs Proteus
Side-by-side comparison of EMMA L (IPLUSMOBOT) and Proteus (Amazon Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EMMA LChina
- ProteusUnited States
Year First Available
- EMMA L—
- Proteus2022
Verified Deployments
- EMMA L0 Deployments
- Proteus0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EMMA L8 hrs
- Proteus—
Availability Status
- EMMA LACTIVE
- ProteusACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EMMA L1,500 kg
- Proteus22.7 kg
AMR Subtype
- EMMA Lother
- Proteusunit load carrier
Length
- EMMA L983 mm
- Proteus—
Width
- EMMA L781 mm
- Proteus—
Turning Radius
- EMMA L942 mm
- Proteus—
Min Aisle Width
- EMMA L700 mm
- Proteus—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EMMA Llidar slam
- Proteusslam natural
Localization Accuracy
- EMMA L30 mm
- Proteus—
Docking Repeatability
- EMMA L2 mm
- Proteus—
Pedestrian Detection
- EMMA L—
- ProteusYes
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- EMMA L1.2 m/s
- Proteus—
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- EMMA L1.5 m/s
- Proteus—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EMMA L—
- Proteusother
Auto Docking
- EMMA LYes
- Proteus—
Safety
Safety Category
- EMMA L—
- ProteusSIL2
Emergency Stops
- EMMA L1
- Proteus—
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EMMA L210 °
- Proteus—
Connectivity
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- EMMA L—
- ProteusYes
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 22.7 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 983 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 781 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 942 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 700 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | slam natural |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 30 mm | — |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | 2 mm | — |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | — | other |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | SIL2 |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 1 | — |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 210 ° | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | — | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EMMA L and Proteus?
EMMA L is made by IPLUSMOBOT, based in CN. Proteus is made by Amazon Robotics, based in US.
How do EMMA L and Proteus compare on the Robo Index?
EMMA L grades BBB on the Robo Index. Proteus grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EMMA L and Proteus in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EMMA L and Proteus?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
EMMA L vs Proteus compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.