Enon vs Hobbs W1
Side-by-side comparison of Enon (Unknown) and Hobbs W1 (Noetix) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Enon—
Hobbs W1CN
Year First Available
- Enon2005
- Hobbs W12025
Verified Deployments
- Enon0 Deployments
- Hobbs W10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Enon$112
- Hobbs W1$320
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Enon—
- Hobbs W16 hrs
Availability Status
- EnonACTIVE
- Hobbs W1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- Enon37.7 kg
- Hobbs W175 kg
Height
- Enon435 mm
- Hobbs W11700 mm
Walking Speed
- Enon0.8 m/s
- Hobbs W11.2 m/s
Terrain
- Enonindoor
- Hobbs W1indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Enon10 kg
- Hobbs W12 kg
Total DOF
- Enon12
- Hobbs W111
Arm DOF
- Enon5
- Hobbs W15
Hand DOF
- Enon1
- Hobbs W16
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- EnonAdvanced ARM Processor
- Hobbs W1RK 3588
Programming
- EnonBluetooth, RF, WiFi, iOS
- Hobbs W1—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Enon—
- Hobbs W16 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- EnonBluetooth, RF, WiFi, iOS
- Hobbs W1—
Open API
- EnonYes
- Hobbs W1—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Enon$112
- Hobbs W1$320
Price Tier
- Enon<10K
- Hobbs W120-40K
Pricing Model
- Enonpurchase
- Hobbs W1purchase
Warranty
- Enon10 yrs
- Hobbs W12 yrs
Applications
- Enonhome_cinema
- Hobbs W1hospitality, retail, education, corporate
| EnonhumanoidUnknown 55.8Trust Score | Hobbs W1humanoidNoetix 43.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2005 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $112 | $320 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 37.7 kg | 75 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 435 mm | 1700 mm |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.8 m/s | 1.2 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 12 | 11 |
| Arm DOF | 5 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 1 | 6 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Advanced ARM Processor | RK 3588 |
| Programming (values differ) | Bluetooth, RF, WiFi, iOS | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Bluetooth, RF, WiFi, iOS | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $112 | $320 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 10 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | home_cinema | hospitality, retail, education, corporate |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Enon vs Hobbs W1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.