Enon vs Hobbs W1
Side-by-side comparison of Enon (Unknown) and Hobbs W1 (Noetix) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 EnonhumanoidUnknown55.8Trust Score |  Hobbs W1humanoidNoetix43.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2005 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $112 | $320 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 435 mm | 1700 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 37.7 kg | 75 kg |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.8 m/s | 1.2 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 12 | 11 |
| Arm DOF | 5 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 1 | 6 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Advanced ARM Processor | RK 3588 |
| Programming (values differ) | Bluetooth, RF, WiFi, iOS | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Bluetooth, RF, WiFi, iOS | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $112 | $320 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 10 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | home_cinema | hospitality, retail, education, corporate |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Enon vs Hobbs W1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.