Side-by-side comparison of ESCOTT EST-12 Collaborative Robot (Suzhou Escott Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd) and HC30PL (Motoman) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Verified Deployments


Availability Status


Repeatability


IP Rating


Reach


Payload


Degrees of Freedom


Mounting Options


Safety Rating


Force/Torque Sensing


Duty Cycle


No-Code Capable


Programming Interface


Tool Flange Standard


Integrated F/T Sensor


Wrist Power Supply


SDK Languages


ROS Compatible


Fieldbus Protocols


Warranty


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Japan |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | 1,700 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | — | 30 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | software only |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | dragging_and_drop, visual_block | teach_pendant |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | Air + Ethernet + I/O (thru-arm, Category 6 cable) |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | INFORM (proprietary) |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | — | No |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | TCP/IP, Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, Profinet | EtherNet/IP |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Changer Support, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Lead Time
Frequently asked
ESCOTT EST-12 Collaborative Robot is made by Suzhou Escott Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. HC30PL is made by Motoman, based in JP.
ESCOTT EST-12 Collaborative Robot has a reach of 1327 mm. HC30PL has a reach of 1700 mm.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
ESCOTT EST-12 Collaborative Robot vs HC30PL compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.