EVEr3 vs Potaro
Side-by-side comparison of EVEr3 (Haolodi Robotics) and Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EVEr3NO
- PotaroJP
Year First Available
- EVEr32020
- Potaro2023
Verified Deployments
- EVEr30 Deployments
- Potaro0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- EVEr3$150,000
- PotaroContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EVEr36 hrs
- Potaro—
Availability Status
- EVEr3ACTIVE
- PotaroACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- EVEr387 kg
- Potaro—
Height
- EVEr31880 mm
- Potaro1984 mm
Mobility Type
- EVEr3—
- Potarowheeled
Humanoid Subtype
- EVEr3android
- Potaroservice humanoid
Walking Speed
- EVEr34 m/s
- Potaro—
Terrain
- EVEr3both
- Potaroflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- EVEr38 kg
- Potaro—
Total DOF
- EVEr323
- Potaro—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- EVEr3Optional deep learning compute add-on
- PotaroGeneral server with two GPUs
Battery & Power
Runtime
- EVEr36 hrs
- Potaro—
Avg Power Consumption
- EVEr3—
- Potaro1,500 W
Safety
Human Detection Method
- EVEr3—
- Potarovision human
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- EVEr3—
- Potaroproduction pilot
Commercial
Price (USD)
- EVEr3$150,000
- PotaroContact for quote
Production Pilots
- EVEr3—
- PotaroToyota Memorial Hospital
Applications
- EVEr3eldercare_assistance, teleoperation
- Potarohospitality
53.2Trust Score | 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | NO | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2020 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $150,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 6 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 87 kg | — |
| Height (values differ) | 1880 mm | 1984 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | android | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 8 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 23 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Optional deep learning compute add-on | General server with two GPUs |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | — |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | — | 1,500 W |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $150,000 | Contact for quote |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | Toyota Memorial Hospital |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, teleoperation | hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
EVEr3 vs Potaro compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.