ExoHead vs HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
Side-by-side comparison of ExoHead (GOGOA) and HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP (Cyberdyne) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExoHeadSpain
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJPJapan
Year First Available
- ExoHead2025
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP2018
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- ExoHead35 hrs
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP1 hrs
Availability Status
- ExoHeadACTIVE
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJPACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- ExoHead—
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP100 kg
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Spain | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2018 |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 35 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | — | 100 kg |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Price, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | ExoHead | HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
ExoHead, HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes ExoHead and HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP?
ExoHead is made by GOGOA, based in ES. HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP.
When were ExoHead and HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP launched?
ExoHead launched in 2025. HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP launched in 2018.
How do ExoHead and HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP compare on the Robo Score?
ExoHead scores 48.7 on the Robo Score. HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP scores 62.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are ExoHead and HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between ExoHead and HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
ExoHead vs HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.