EXPLORER MB vs HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
Side-by-side comparison of EXPLORER MB (Marsi Bionics) and HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ (Cyberdyne) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EXPLORER MBSpain
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプJapan
Year First Available
- EXPLORER MB2025
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ2015
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EXPLORER MB—
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ2 hrs
Availability Status
- EXPLORER MBACTIVE
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Spain | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2015 |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Price, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EXPLORER MB | HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EXPLORER MB, HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EXPLORER MB and HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ?
EXPLORER MB is made by Marsi Bionics, based in ES. HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP.
When were EXPLORER MB and HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ launched?
EXPLORER MB launched in 2025. HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ launched in 2015.
How do EXPLORER MB and HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ compare on the Robo Score?
EXPLORER MB scores 48.0 on the Robo Score. HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ scores 62.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EXPLORER MB and HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EXPLORER MB and HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EXPLORER MB vs HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.