Side-by-side comparison of FIC40 (Linkhou) and RJM110 Robot Joint Module (Linkhou) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country
Verified Deployments
Availability Status
Payload Capacity
Reach
Max Speed
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 10 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 1,210 mm |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 1 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Frequently asked
FIC40 is made by Linkhou, based in CN. RJM110 Robot Joint Module is made by Linkhou, based in CN.
FIC40 scores 19/100. RJM110 Robot Joint Module scores 19/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Actuator on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss.
FIC40 vs RJM110 Robot Joint Module compares two robots in the actuator category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.