Figure 01 vs KUAVO 3.0
Side-by-side comparison of Figure 01 (Figure AI) and KUAVO 3.0 (Leju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Figure 01humanoidFigure AI—Trust Score |  KUAVO 3.0humanoidLeju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$26,970 | US$30,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 7 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 170 mm | 1750 mm |
| Weight | 60 kg | 60 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 4.6 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | demo only | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | stairs, tight_corners, shifting_layouts | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 25 | 26 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 14 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | 10 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | External processing | Embedded platform with KaihongOS |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Orin | — |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 7 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Open API (values differ) | No | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | alpha pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $26,970 | $30,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 30-150K | 30-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | enterprise-only | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing, logistics | smart_home, industrial_manufacturing, public/commercial_service, smart_healthcare |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Figure 01 vs KUAVO 3.0 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.