Side-by-side comparison of Figure 03 (Figure AI) and Wanda 2.0 (UniX AI) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Arm Reach


Manipulation Repeatability


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Charging Method


Force-Limited Arms


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Applications


| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $130,000 | $85,050 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 5 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1730 mm | 170 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 61 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 12 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 48 | 23 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 24 | 8 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 24 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 98.2 cm |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | full bimanual |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | production validated |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 275 TOPS |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | vr_headset |
| Programming (values differ) | — | imitation_learning_ui |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | auto dock |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | software_defined |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | imitation_learning_ui |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | No |
| Open API (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $130,000 | $85,050 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing, logistics, quality inspection | hospitality, household, property_management, security |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Figure 03 is made by Figure AI, based in US. Wanda 2.0 is made by UniX AI, based in CN.
Figure 03 launched in 2025. Wanda 2.0 launched in 2026.
Figure 03 is listed at $130,000. Wanda 2.0 is listed at $85,050.
Figure 03 scores 62/100. Wanda 2.0 scores 46/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Figure 03 carries up to 20 kg. Wanda 2.0 carries up to 12 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Figure 03 vs Wanda 2.0 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.