FL-Jade vs HT-GJ30
Side-by-side comparison of FL-Jade (Henan Mingqing Food Machinery Co., Ltd.) and HT-GJ30 (Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- FL-Jade—
- HT-GJ30China
Verified Deployments
- FL-Jade0 Deployments
- HT-GJ300 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- FL-Jade$3,800
- HT-GJ30$1,230
Battery / Shift Runtime
- FL-Jade8 hrs
- HT-GJ3012 hrs
Availability Status
- FL-JadeACTIVE
- HT-GJ30ACTIVE
Physical
Payload
- FL-Jade—
- HT-GJ30300 kg
Robot Weight
- FL-Jade—
- HT-GJ3065 kg
Dimensions
- FL-JadeL460*W460*H1200
- HT-GJ301650*580*550
Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- FL-Jadelidar slam,vision
- HT-GJ30other
Power
Battery Runtime
- FL-Jade8 hrs
- HT-GJ3012 hrs
Commercial
Price (USD)
- FL-Jade$3,800
- HT-GJ30$1,230
Warranty
- FL-Jade1 yrs
- HT-GJ301 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $3,800 | $1,230 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 300 kg |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 65 kg |
| Dimensions (values differ) | L460*W460*H1200 | 1650*580*550 |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | other |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $3,800 | $1,230 |
| Warranty | 1 yrs | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Tray Count, Compartment Type, IP Rating, Max Speed, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Auto Docking, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Floor Compatibility, Display Size, Voice Interaction, Noise Level, Languages Supported, RaaS / Month
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes FL-Jade and HT-GJ30?
FL-Jade is made by Henan Mingqing Food Machinery Co., Ltd.. HT-GJ30 is made by Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How much does FL-Jade cost compared to HT-GJ30?
FL-Jade is listed at $3,800. HT-GJ30 is listed at $1,230.
How do FL-Jade and HT-GJ30 compare on the Robolist Product Score?
FL-Jade scores 17/100. HT-GJ30 scores 56/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are FL-Jade and HT-GJ30 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Hospitality Service robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between FL-Jade and HT-GJ30?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
FL-Jade vs HT-GJ30 compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.