FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV vs PUDU T600 潜伏版
Side-by-side comparison of FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV (Zhongjiang Robot (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.) and PUDU T600 潜伏版 (Shenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV—
- PUDU T600 潜伏版China
Year First Available
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV—
- PUDU T600 潜伏版2026
Verified Deployments
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV0 Deployments
- PUDU T600 潜伏版0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV$16,400 USD
- PUDU T600 潜伏版Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV12 hrs
- PUDU T600 潜伏版12 hrs
Availability Status
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGVACTIVE
- PUDU T600 潜伏版ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV2,000 kg
- PUDU T600 潜伏版600 kg
Max Speed
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV—
- PUDU T600 潜伏版1.2 m/s
IP Rating
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGVwaterproof_and_dustproof
- PUDU T600 潜伏版—
Autonomy Level
- FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV—
- PUDU T600 潜伏版fully autonomous
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $16,400 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) | 12 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 2,000 kg | 600 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 1.2 m/s |
| IP Rating (values differ) | waterproof_and_dustproof | — |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | — | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV and PUDU T600 潜伏版?
FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV is made by Zhongjiang Robot (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.. PUDU T600 潜伏版 is made by Shenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV and PUDU T600 潜伏版 compare on the Robo Index?
FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV scores 39/100. PUDU T600 潜伏版 scores 90/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV and PUDU T600 潜伏版?
FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV carries up to 2000 kg. PUDU T600 潜伏版 carries up to 600 kg.
Are FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV and PUDU T600 潜伏版 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agv on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Agv robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Agv TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV and PUDU T600 潜伏版?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance
10 min readAGVs
AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in
10 min readAGVs
Running an AGV pilot: what should pass and what should fail it
9 min readAGVs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
FL1000A Stacker-Type AGV vs PUDU T600 潜伏版 compares two robots in the agv category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.