FOLA vs MiR100
Side-by-side comparison of FOLA (IPLUSMOBOT) and MiR100 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- FOLAChina
- MiR100Denmark
Year First Available
- FOLA—
- MiR1002015
Verified Deployments
- FOLA0 Deployments
- MiR1000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- FOLA8 hrs
- MiR100—
Availability Status
- FOLAACTIVE
- MiR100ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- FOLA300 kg
- MiR100100 kg
AMR Subtype
- FOLAforklift amr
- MiR100unit load carrier
Length
- FOLA1,124 mm
- MiR100—
Width
- FOLA428 mm
- MiR100—
Turning Radius
- FOLA1,801 mm
- MiR100—
Min Aisle Width
- FOLA600 mm
- MiR100—
Robot Weight
- FOLA—
- MiR100350 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- FOLAlidar slam,visual slam,hybrid slam
- MiR100slam natural
Pedestrian Detection
- FOLAYes
- MiR100—
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- FOLA1.2 m/s
- MiR100—
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- FOLA1.5 m/s
- MiR100—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- FOLAli ion nmc
- MiR100li ion
Charging Time
- FOLA1.5 hrs
- MiR100—
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- FOLAYes
- MiR100—
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- FOLA360 °
- MiR100—
Connectivity
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- FOLAYes
- MiR100—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 300 kg | 100 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | forklift amr | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 1,124 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 428 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 1,801 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 600 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 350 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,visual slam,hybrid slam | slam natural |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion nmc | li ion |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | Yes | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | FOLA | MiR100 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
FOLA, MiR100 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes FOLA and MiR100?
FOLA is made by IPLUSMOBOT, based in CN. MiR100 is made by MiR, based in DK.
How do FOLA and MiR100 compare on the Robo Score?
FOLA scores 51.1 on the Robo Score. MiR100 scores 73.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are FOLA and MiR100 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between FOLA and MiR100?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
FOLA vs MiR100 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.