GR-2 humanoid vs Pepper
Side-by-side comparison of GR-2 humanoid (Shanghai Fourier Intelligence Co., Ltd.) and Pepper (SoftBank Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 GR-2 humanoidhumanoidShanghai Fourier Intelligence Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  PepperhumanoidSoftBank Robotics13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | USA |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$75,000 | US$2,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 175 mm | 121 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 63 kg | 29 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | 0.6 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | static walk |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 53 | 20 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 1 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Intel ATOM® E3845 |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel ATOM® E3845 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | none |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset, joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | VR remote control, lead-through programming, direct command | proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.8 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 8.3 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | tethered |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS | Python, C++, Java |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Lab, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production scale |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IPX0 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $75,000 | $2,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 20-40K |
| RaaS / Month (values differ) | — | $671 |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | capex |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | HSBC, Carrefour, Renault, Costa Cruise |
| Applications (values differ) | research, AI development, real-world applications | hospitality, eldercare_assistance, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
About this comparison
GR-2 humanoid vs Pepper compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.