G1 vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of G1 (Unitree Robotics) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 G1humanoidUnitree Robotics—Trust Score |  NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 126 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 17 | 52 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | UnifoLM-WMA-0 | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | voice, mobile app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | research_development | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
G1 vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.