G1 vs Sanbot Nano
Side-by-side comparison of G1 (Unitree Robotics) and Sanbot Nano (Sanbot Innovation Technology) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
G1CN
Sanbot Nano—
Year First Available
- G12024
- Sanbot Nano2017
Verified Deployments
- G10 Deployments
- Sanbot Nano0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- G12 hrs
- Sanbot Nano—
Availability Status
- G1ACTIVE
- Sanbot NanoACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- G1126 mm
- Sanbot Nano—
Mobility Type
- G1bipedal
- Sanbot Nano—
Humanoid Subtype
- G1full bipedal
- Sanbot Nano—
Terrain
- G1indoor
- Sanbot Nanoindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- G13 kg
- Sanbot Nano—
Total DOF
- G117
- Sanbot Nano—
Arm DOF
- G17
- Sanbot Nano—
Manipulation Repeatability
- G1±0.5 mm
- Sanbot Nano—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- G1100 TOPS
- Sanbot Nano—
Compute Platform
- G1NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB
- Sanbot Nano—
Foundation Models
- G1UnifoLM-WMA-0
- Sanbot Nano—
Programming
- G1code_python, code_ros
- Sanbot Nano—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- G12 hrs
- Sanbot Nano—
Software
SDK Languages
- G1Python, C++, ROS2
- Sanbot Nano—
ROS Support
- G1ros2 vendor
- Sanbot Nano—
Simulation Platforms
- G1NVIDIA Isaac Sim
- Sanbot Nano—
Open API
- G1open rest
- Sanbot Nano—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- G1production pilot
- Sanbot Nano—
Commercial
Applications
- G1research_development
- Sanbot Nanohome, education, healthcare, public_service
| G1humanoidUnitree Robotics 51.5Trust Score | Sanbot NanohumanoidSanbot Innovation Technology 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 126 mm | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 17 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | UnifoLM-WMA-0 | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research_development | home, education, healthcare, public_service |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
G1 vs Sanbot Nano compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.