G1 vs SkyBot
Side-by-side comparison of G1 (Unitree Robotics) and SkyBot (Ceilix) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
G1CN
SkyBotDE
Year First Available
- G12024
- SkyBot2024
Verified Deployments
- G10 Deployments
- SkyBot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- G12 hrs
- SkyBot0.3 hrs
Availability Status
- G1ACTIVE
- SkyBotACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- G1126 mm
- SkyBot250 mm
Weight
- G1—
- SkyBot23.2 kg
Mobility Type
- G1bipedal
- SkyBotstatic
Humanoid Subtype
- G1full bipedal
- SkyBotservice humanoid
Terrain
- G1indoor
- SkyBotindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- G13 kg
- SkyBot250 kg
Total DOF
- G117
- SkyBot—
Arm DOF
- G17
- SkyBot—
Manipulation Repeatability
- G1±0.5 mm
- SkyBot—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- G1100 TOPS
- SkyBot—
Compute Platform
- G1NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB
- SkyBot—
Foundation Models
- G1UnifoLM-WMA-0
- SkyBot—
Programming
- G1code_python, code_ros
- SkyBot—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- G12 hrs
- SkyBot0.3 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- G1Python, C++, ROS2
- SkyBot—
ROS Support
- G1ros2 vendor
- SkyBot—
Simulation Platforms
- G1NVIDIA Isaac Sim
- SkyBot—
Open API
- G1open rest
- SkyBot—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- G1production pilot
- SkyBotproduction pilot
Commercial
Applications
- G1research_development
- SkyBotwarehouse_transport, logistics_handling, manufacturing_assembly
| G1humanoidUnitree Robotics 51.5Trust Score | SkyBothumanoidCeilix 46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available | 2024 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 0.3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 126 mm | 250 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 23.2 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | service humanoid |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 250 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 17 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | UnifoLM-WMA-0 | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 0.3 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | production pilot | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research_development | warehouse_transport, logistics_handling, manufacturing_assembly |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
G1 vs SkyBot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.