Side-by-side comparison of GP88 (Yaskawa) and Z-Arm (Hu Nan Qin Feng Robot Corporation Limited) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Availability Status


Payload


Robot Weight


Reach


Degrees of Freedom


Repeatability


Max TCP Speed


MTBF


Duty Cycle


Controller Model


Teach Pendant Type


ROS-Industrial Support


Tool Flange Standard


Internal Cable Routing


Price (USD)


Service Network


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $6,000 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 3 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 19 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 200 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 4 |
| Repeatability | ±0.03 mm | ±0.03 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 1.3 m/s |
| Performance | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | 28 hrs | — |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | not specified |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | — | Built-in Motion Controller |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired button |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | none |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | other |
| Internal Cable Routing | through arm | through arm |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $6,000 |
| Service Network (values differ) | global | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
Frequently asked
GP88 is made by Yaskawa, based in JP. Z-Arm is made by Hu Nan Qin Feng Robot Corporation Limited, based in CN.
GP88 scores 49/100. Z-Arm scores 46/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
GP88 has a reach of 2236 mm. Z-Arm has a reach of 400 mm.
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
GP88 vs Z-Arm compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.