Side-by-side comparison of HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 (CYBERDYNE INC.) and HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP (CYBERDYNE INC.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Battery / Shift Runtime
Availability Status
Payload Capacity
—Trust Score | 58.7Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | JP | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2022 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4.5 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | — | 100 kg |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 vs HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.