HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP vs Skelex 360
Side-by-side comparison of HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP (Cyberdyne) and Skelex 360 (Skelex) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJPJapan
- Skelex 360Netherlands
Year First Available
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP2018
- Skelex 3602017
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJPContact for quote
- Skelex 360$2,995 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP1 hrs
- Skelex 360—
Availability Status
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJPACTIVE
- Skelex 360ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP100 kg
- Skelex 360—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Netherlands |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2018 | 2017 |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $2,995 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | 100 kg | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP | Skelex 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $2,995 |
| Payback period | — | < 1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $247,005 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +8247% |
HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Skelex 360?
HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. Skelex 360 is made by Skelex, based in NL.
When were HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Skelex 360 launched?
HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP launched in 2018. Skelex 360 launched in 2017.
How do HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Skelex 360 compare on the Robo Score?
HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP scores 62.1 on the Robo Score. Skelex 360 scores 55.7. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Skelex 360 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Skelex 360?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP vs Skelex 360 compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.