HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05) vs Potaro
Side-by-side comparison of HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05) (Cyberdyne) and Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)JP
PotaroJP
Year First Available
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- Potaro2023
Verified Deployments
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)0 Deployments
- Potaro0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)1 hrs
- Potaro—
Availability Status
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)ACTIVE
- PotaroACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)1230 mm
- Potaro1984 mm
Mobility Type
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- Potarowheeled
Humanoid Subtype
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- Potaroservice humanoid
Terrain
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)indoor
- Potaroflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)100 kg
- Potaro—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- PotaroGeneral server with two GPUs
Battery & Power
Runtime
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)1 hrs
- Potaro—
Avg Power Consumption
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- Potaro1,500 W
Safety
Human Detection Method
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- Potarovision human
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- Potaroproduction pilot
Commercial
Production Pilots
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)—
- PotaroToyota Memorial Hospital
Applications
- HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)rehabilitation, hospitality
- Potarohospitality
| HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05)humanoidCyberdyne 42.9Trust Score | PotarohumanoidToyota Motor Corporation 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | JP | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1230 mm | 1984 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | service humanoid |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 100 kg | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | General server with two GPUs |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | — | 1,500 W |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | Toyota Memorial Hospital |
| Applications (values differ) | rehabilitation, hospitality | hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Total DOF, Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
HAL Lower Limb (HAL-ML05) vs Potaro compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.