Side-by-side comparison of HRP-4C (AIST) and Optimus (Tesla) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Payload (Peak)


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Battery Swap


Force-Limited Arms


Fall Recovery


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Simulation Platforms


Open API


IP Rating


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Applications


| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $200,000–$325,000 | $25,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 158 mm | 173 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 46 kg | 25.4 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.5 m/s | 2.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat indoor, uneven outdoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 9 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 68 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 42 | 75 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 6 | 28 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 2 | 22 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | full bimanual |
| Tool Use (values differ) | none | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Intel Pentium M 1.6 GHz | Tesla AI5 chip |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) computer |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | none | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | single task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | motion_capture | — |
| Programming (values differ) | motion_capture, teleoperation | code_python, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 2.3 kWh |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | none | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | motion_capture, teleoperation | code_python, proprietary_app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | OpenHRP3 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | closed | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | IP68 FOREARM TO HANDS & FOOT |
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $200,000–$325,000 | $25,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 2 mo |
| Applications (values differ) | entertainment, research | logistics, healthcare, domestic use |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
HRP-4C is made by AIST, based in JP. Optimus is made by Tesla, based in US.
HRP-4C launched in 2009. Optimus launched in 2022.
HRP-4C scores 28/100. Optimus scores 69/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
HRP-4C carries up to 0.5 kg. Optimus carries up to 68 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
HRP-4C vs Optimus compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.