Side-by-side comparison of HT-Amy2 (Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd.) and QB-ROBOT-72 (Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Payload


Robot Weight


Tray Count


Compartment Type


Dimensions


Navigation Type


Max Speed


Battery Runtime


Charge Time


Auto Docking


Price (USD)


Warranty


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $2,639 | $3,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 12 hrs | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 45 kg | — |
| Tray Count (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | open trays | — |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 1500x560x810 | — |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | lidar slam |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.7 m/s | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | 12 hrs | 6 hrs |
| Charge Time (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,639 | $3,000 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, IP Rating, Min Passable Width, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Floor Compatibility, Display Size, Voice Interaction, Noise Level, Languages Supported, RaaS / Month
Frequently asked
HT-Amy2 is made by Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd., based in CN. QB-ROBOT-72 is made by Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
HT-Amy2 is listed at $2,639. QB-ROBOT-72 is listed at $3,000.
HT-Amy2 scores 56/100. QB-ROBOT-72 scores 35/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
HT-Amy2 vs QB-ROBOT-72 compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.