HUBO2 vs 天链人形机器人T1
Side-by-side comparison of HUBO2 (Rainbow Robotics Co., Ltd.) and 天链人形机器人T1 (四川天链机器人股份有限公司) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
HUBO2KR
天链人形机器人T1CN
Year First Available
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T12024
Verified Deployments
- HUBO20 Deployments
- 天链人形机器人T10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- HUBO2ACTIVE
- 天链人形机器人T1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T143 kg
Height
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T1160 mm
Mobility Type
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T1full bipedal
Walking Speed
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T12.2 m/s
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T18 kg
Payload (Peak)
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T116 kg
Total DOF
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T171
Hand DOF
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T13
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T1prototype
Commercial
Applications
- HUBO2—
- 天链人形机器人T1research, hazardous_env
| HUBO2humanoidRainbow Robotics Co., Ltd. 17.4Trust Score | 天链人形机器人T1humanoid四川天链机器人股份有限公司 46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | KR | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 43 kg |
| Height (values differ) | — | 160 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2.2 m/s |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 8 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 16 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 71 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | — | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Terrain, Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Onboard Compute, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
HUBO2 vs 天链人形机器人T1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.