iCub vs TURTLE
Side-by-side comparison of iCub (Italian Institute of Technology (IIT)) and TURTLE (Eindhoven University of Technology) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
iCubIT
TURTLE—
Year First Available
- iCub2004
- TURTLE2012
Verified Deployments
- iCub0 Deployments
- TURTLE0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- iCub$300,000
- TURTLE$1,500
Battery / Shift Runtime
- iCub—
- TURTLE2.5 hrs
Availability Status
- iCubACTIVE
- TURTLEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- iCub1.5 kg
- TURTLE80 kg
Max Speed
- iCub—
- TURTLE3.5 m/s
Autonomy Level
- iCubsemi-autonomous
- TURTLEfully autonomous
| iCubresearchItalian Institute of Technology (IIT) 55.8Trust Score | TURTLEresearchEindhoven University of Technology 55.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | IT | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2004 | 2012 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $300,000 | $1,500 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | 1.5 kg | 80 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 3.5 m/s |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | semi-autonomous | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
iCub vs TURTLE compares two robots in the research category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.