InMoov vs Pibo
Side-by-side comparison of InMoov (Gael Langevin) and Pibo (Circulus Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
 InMoovhumanoidGael Langevin—Trust Score |  PibohumanoidCirculus Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2012 | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1800 mm | 250 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | 50 | 10 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Arduino microcontrollers (Uno, Mega) | 1.4Ghz quad-core chip |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, web-based UI, remote control | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, web-based UI, remote control | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | education & STEM, research, maker projects, museum installations | museum interaction |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
InMoov vs Pibo compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.