Side-by-side comparison of IRON (XPeng) and Mercury (Apptronik, Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
IRONCNYear First Available
IRON2024Verified Deployments
IRON0 DeploymentsPrice Range (USD)
IRON$150,000Battery / Shift Runtime
IRON—Availability Status
IRONACTIVEHeight
IRON1780 mmWeight
IRON70 kgHumanoid Subtype
IRONbipedalWalking Speed
IRON2 m/sTerrain
IRONindoorPayload
IRON20 kgTotal DOF
IRON22Arm DOF
IRON—Hand DOF
IRON22Onboard Compute
IRONTuring AI chipProgramming
IRONcode_python, no_code_guiRuntime
IRON—SDK Languages
IRONcode_python, no_code_guiROS Support
IRON—Open API
IRONYesPrice (USD)
IRON$150,000Price Tier
IRON150K+Pricing Model
IRONpurchaseApplications
IRONelectric_vehicle_assembly, administrative_support, customer_service_operations, household_assistance IRONhumanoidXPeng61.8Trust Score | MercuryhumanoidApptronik, Inc. 51.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) | $150,000 | $150,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1780 mm | 1180 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 70 kg | 55 kg |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 1.2 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 1 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | 19 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 17 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Turing AI chip | Jetson Orin Nano SUPER 8GB |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, no_code_gui | code_python, code_cpp, no_code_gui |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, no_code_gui | code_python, code_cpp, no_code_gui |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) | $150,000 | $150,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | electric_vehicle_assembly, administrative_support, customer_service_operations, household_assistance | research, education, service, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
IRON vs Mercury compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.