Keenon XMAN R1 vs Moz1
Side-by-side comparison of Keenon XMAN R1 (KEENON) and Moz1 (Spirit AI (万境千寻科技有限公司)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Keenon XMAN R1CN
Moz1CN
Year First Available
Keenon XMAN R1—
Moz12025
Verified Deployments
Keenon XMAN R10 Deployments
Moz10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
Keenon XMAN R1$100,000
Moz1$150,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
Keenon XMAN R13 hrs
Moz1—
Availability Status
Keenon XMAN R1ACTIVE
Moz1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
Keenon XMAN R1172 mm
Moz1—
Weight
Keenon XMAN R1110 kg
Moz1—
Mobility Type
Keenon XMAN R1bipedal
Moz1—
Humanoid Subtype
Keenon XMAN R1service humanoid
Moz1—
Walking Speed
Keenon XMAN R10.8 m/s
Moz1—
Terrain
Keenon XMAN R1flat_indoor
Moz1—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
Keenon XMAN R13 kg
Moz1—
Payload (Peak)
Keenon XMAN R13 kg
Moz1—
Total DOF
Keenon XMAN R136
Moz126
Hand DOF
Keenon XMAN R110
Moz1—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
Keenon XMAN R1—
Moz1VLA Spirit v1 model
Battery & Power
Runtime
Keenon XMAN R13 hrs
Moz1—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
Keenon XMAN R1production pilot
Moz1—
Commercial
Price (USD)
Keenon XMAN R1$100,000
Moz1$150,000
Price Tier
Keenon XMAN R180-150K
Moz1150K+
Pricing Model
Keenon XMAN R1purchase
Moz1purchase
Applications
Keenon XMAN R1hospitality, logistics, property operations
Moz1office automation, home assistance, commercial service, embodied-AI research
Keenon XMAN R1humanoidKEENON56.5Trust Score | Moz1humanoidSpirit AI (万境千寻科技有限公司)37.2Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $150,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 172 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 110 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.8 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 36 | 26 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | VLA Spirit v1 model |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $150,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, logistics, property operations | office automation, home assistance, commercial service, embodied-AI research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Keenon XMAN R1 vs Moz1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.