Side-by-side comparison of Kobian (Waseda University) and Optimus (Tesla) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Weight


Height


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Payload (Peak)


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Bimanual Coordination


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Battery Swap


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


Deployment Maturity


IP Rating


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Applications


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2007 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $25,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 0.3 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 62 kg | 25.4 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 140 mm | 173 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.5 m/s | 2.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | flat indoor, uneven outdoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 9 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 68 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 65 | 75 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 28 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | 22 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | Yes | full bimanual |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | QNX real-time OS | Tesla AI5 chip |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) computer |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming (values differ) | custom control and behavior software | code_python, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 0.3 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 2.3 kWh |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | QNX | code_python, proprietary_app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | ros2 vendor |
| Open API (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | research | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP68 FOREARM TO HANDS & FOOT |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $25,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 2 mo |
| Applications (values differ) | emotion expression, culture-specific greetings, human-like speech simulation, robot comedian | logistics, healthcare, domestic use |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Teleoperation, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Kobian is made by Waseda University, based in JP. Optimus is made by Tesla, based in US.
Kobian launched in 2007. Optimus launched in 2022.
Kobian scores 38/100. Optimus scores 69/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Kobian vs Optimus compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.