KUAVO 3.0 vs T800
Side-by-side comparison of KUAVO 3.0 (Leju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.) and T800 (EngineAI Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 KUAVO 3.0humanoidLeju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  T800humanoidEngineAI Robotics—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$30,000 | US$40,500 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 7 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1750 mm | 180 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 60 kg | 85 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 4.6 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 7 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 21 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 31 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 14 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | 11 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Embedded platform with KaihongOS | AGX Orin 64G |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Tesla custom |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | teleoperation |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | code_python, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 7 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 2.3 kWh |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | Python, C++ |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | ros2 community |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $40,500 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 30-40K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Applications (values differ) | smart_home, industrial_manufacturing, public/commercial_service, smart_healthcare | logistics_warehouse, hospitality, human-robot_collaboration |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Stair Climbing, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
KUAVO 3.0 vs T800 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.