Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot vs MagicBot Z1
Side-by-side comparison of Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot (Reeman Robot) and MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service RobotCN- MagicBot Z1CN
Verified Deployments
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot0 Deployments
- MagicBot Z10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot10 hrs
- MagicBot Z12 hrs
Availability Status
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service RobotACTIVE
- MagicBot Z1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1136.9 mm
Mobility Type
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1full bipedal
Terrain
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robotindoor
- MagicBot Z1flat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z12 kg
Payload (Peak)
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z13 kg
Total DOF
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z124
Arm DOF
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z15
Arm Reach
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z150 cm
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z18-core high-performance CPU
Compute Platform
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z18-core high-performance CPU
VLM Capable
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1onboard small
Imitation Learning
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1multi task
Teleoperation
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1joystick
Programming
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1code_python, teleoperation
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot10 hrs
- MagicBot Z12 hrs
Charging Method
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1manual swap
Battery Swap
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1Yes
Safety
Fall Recovery
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1Yes
Human Detection Method
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1multi modal
Software
SDK Languages
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1code_python, teleoperation
Open API
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1limited rest
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot—
- MagicBot Z1beta pilot
Commercial
Applications
- Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robothospitality, consultation, teleoperation
- MagicBot Z1research
| Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service RobothumanoidReeman Robot 26.6Trust Score | MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 136.9 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 5 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 50 cm |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Open API (values differ) | — | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | beta pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, consultation, teleoperation | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Language Interaction Commercial Humanoid Service Robot vs MagicBot Z1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.