LPH-040 vs Quattro
Side-by-side comparison of LPH-040 (DENSO) and Quattro (Omron Adept) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- LPH-040Japan
- QuattroUnited States
Year First Available
- LPH-0402019
- Quattro2006
Verified Deployments
- LPH-0400 Deployments
- Quattro0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- LPH-040$5,392
- Quattro$64,690–$67,924
Availability Status
- LPH-040ACTIVE
- QuattroACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- LPH-0403 kg
- Quattro15 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- LPH-040—
- QuattroIP65/66/67
Reach
- LPH-040400 mm
- Quattro1,600 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- LPH-0404
- Quattro4
Repeatability
- LPH-040±0.02 mm
- Quattro—
Max TCP Speed
- LPH-0404.7 m/s
- Quattro—
Robot Weight
- LPH-04016 kg
- Quattro—
IP Rating (Wrist)
- LPH-040—
- QuattroIP67
Performance
Cycle Time (25/305/25)
- LPH-040—
- Quattro0.3 s
Duty Cycle
- LPH-040multi shift
- Quattrocontinuous 24 7
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- LPH-040RC8
- QuattroOMRON NJ501-R
Programming Languages
- LPH-040—
- QuattroIEC 61131-3
Teach Pendant Type
- LPH-040no pendant (browser UI)
- Quattro—
Offline Programming
- LPH-040WINCAPS III Offline Software
- Quattro—
End-Effector
Internal Cable Routing
- LPH-040—
- Quattrothrough arm
Pneumatic Lines
- LPH-0403
- Quattro—
Electrical Lines
- LPH-04015
- Quattro—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- LPH-040$5,392
- Quattro$64,690–$67,924
Service Network
- LPH-040global
- Quattroregional
Expected Service Life
- LPH-0405 yrs
- Quattro—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2006 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $5,392 | $64,690–$67,924 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 3 kg | 15 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | IP65/66/67 |
| Reach (values differ) | 400 mm | 1,600 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 4 | 4 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.02 mm | — |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 4.7 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 16 kg | — |
| IP Rating (Wrist) (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Performance | ||
| Cycle Time (25/305/25) (values differ) | — | 0.3 s |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | multi shift | continuous 24 7 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | RC8 | OMRON NJ501-R |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | — | IEC 61131-3 |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | no pendant (browser UI) | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | WINCAPS III Offline Software | — |
| End-Effector | ||
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm |
| Pneumatic Lines (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | 15 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $5,392 | $64,690–$67,924 |
| Service Network (values differ) | global | regional |
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | 5 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes LPH-040 and Quattro?
LPH-040 is made by DENSO, based in JP. Quattro is made by Omron Adept, based in US.
When were LPH-040 and Quattro launched?
LPH-040 launched in 2019. Quattro launched in 2006.
How do LPH-040 and Quattro compare on the Robolist Product Score?
LPH-040 scores 63/100. Quattro scores 46/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of LPH-040 compare to Quattro?
LPH-040 has a reach of 400 mm. Quattro has a reach of 1600 mm.
Are LPH-040 and Quattro in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between LPH-040 and Quattro?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
LPH-040 vs Quattro compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.