Mōryō vs MiR200
Side-by-side comparison of Mōryō (Slip Robotics) and MiR200 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Mōryō—
- MiR200Denmark
)
Year First Available
- Mōryō—
- MiR2002017
Verified Deployments
- Mōryō0 Deployments
- MiR2000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Mōryō$255 USD
- MiR200Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Mōryō10 hrs
- MiR2008 hrs
Availability Status
- MōryōACTIVE
- MiR200ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- Mōryō5,443 kg
- MiR2001,200 kg
AMR Subtype
- Mōryōpallet mover
- MiR200unit load carrier
Length
- Mōryō700 mm
- MiR200—
Width
- Mōryō590 mm
- MiR200—
Turning Radius
- Mōryō0 mm
- MiR200—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- Mōryōlidar slam,vision
- MiR200slam natural
Pedestrian Detection
- MōryōYes
- MiR200—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- Mōryōli ion nmc
- MiR200li ion
Opportunity Charging
- MōryōYes
- MiR200—
Auto Docking
- MōryōYes
- MiR200—
Battery Swap
- MōryōYes
- MiR200—
Connectivity
API Type
- Mōryōclosed
- MiR200—
OTA Updates
- MōryōYes
- MiR200—
Reliability
MTBF
- Mōryō10,000 hrs
- MiR200—
Predictive Maintenance
- MōryōYes
- MiR200—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Mōryō$255 USD
- MiR200Contact for quote
Pricing Models
- Mōryōraas
- MiR200—
Warranty
- Mōryō—
- MiR2002 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $255 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 10 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 5,443 kg | 1,200 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | pallet mover | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 700 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 590 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 0 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | slam natural |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion nmc | li ion |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | closed | — |
| OTA Updates (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| MTBF (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 10,000 hrs | — |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $255 USD | Contact for quote |
| Pricing Models (values differ) | raas | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, Cybersecurity Certs, Uptime SLA, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Mōryō and MiR200?
Mōryō is made by Slip Robotics. MiR200 is made by MiR, based in DK.
How do Mōryō and MiR200 compare on the Robo Index?
Mōryō grades BBB on the Robo Index. MiR200 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Mōryō and MiR200 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Mōryō and MiR200?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
Mōryō vs MiR200 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.