MagicBot Gen1 vs MagicBot Z1
Side-by-side comparison of MagicBot Gen1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) and MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
 MagicBot Gen1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. —Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 174 mm | 136.9 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.1 m/s | — |
| Running Capable (values differ) | dynamic walk | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 7.5 kg | 2 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 40 kg | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 42 | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 80 cm | 50 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | coordinated planning | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Imitation Learning | multi task | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | teleoperation, code_python, proprietary_app | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.4 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method | multi modal | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | teleoperation, code_python, proprietary_app | code_python, teleoperation |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | beta pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport, assembly, inspection | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Weight, Stair Climbing, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
MagicBot Gen1 vs MagicBot Z1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.